The present study evaluated the ability of humans to discriminate temp
erature decreases in the noxious and innocuous cold range. Two groups
of five subjects detected changes in cold stimuli applied to the maxil
lary face. For five subjects, adapting temperatures of 22 degrees, 16
degrees, 6 degrees and 0 degrees C were used, and thresholds for detec
ting temperature decreases were determined using an adaptive psychophy
sical paradigm. Visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings of cold and pain s
ensation were also recorded at 5-min intervals throughout each session
. A second group of five subjects performed a similar detection task,
but in this case using classical psychophysical techniques (method of
constant stimuli) and adapting temperatures of 22 degrees, 16 degrees,
6 degrees and 0 degrees C. These subjects described the quality of th
e detected change in sensation, in addition to rating overall cold and
pain sensation throughout the session. Detection thresholds were 0.27
degrees, 0.48 degrees, 4.8 degrees, 8.0 degrees and > 10.0 degrees C
for baselines of 22 degrees, 16 degrees, 10 degrees, 6 degrees and 0 d
egrees C, respectively, indicating that discrimination was better in t
he innocuous cool (22 degrees and 16 degrees C) than in the noxious an
d near-noxious cold (10-0 degrees C) range (P < 0.05). Tonic adapting
temperatures of 22 degrees and 16 degrees C were always rated as cool
but not painful, whereas adapting temperatures of 10 degrees and 6 deg
rees were sometimes and 0 degrees C usually rated as painful. Phasic t
emperature decreases from 22 degrees and 16 degrees C always produced
cooling sensations, whereas decreases from baselines of 10 degrees and
6 degrees C produced primarily sensations of painful and non-painful
prickle. These data suggest that different afferent channels mediate c
ool and noxious cold perception and add support to the hypothesis that
noxious cold sensation is mediated by subdermal nociceptors.