Protein feeding pattern does not affect protein retention in young women

Citation
Ma. Arnal et al., Protein feeding pattern does not affect protein retention in young women, J NUTR, 130(7), 2000, pp. 1700-1704
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
ISSN journal
00223166 → ACNP
Volume
130
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1700 - 1704
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3166(200007)130:7<1700:PFPDNA>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine whether a pulse protein feeding patt ern was more efficient than a spread pattern to improve protein anabolism i n young women as was already shown in elderly women. After a 15-d adaptive period [1.2 g protein/(kg fat-free mass . d)], 16 young women (age 26 +/- 1 y) were given a 14-d diet providing 1.7 g protein/(kg fat-free mass . d), using either a pulse pattern (protein consumed mainly in one meal, n = 8), or a spread pattern (spreading daily protein intake over four meals, n = 8) . Nitrogen balance was determined at the end of both the 15-d adaptive and the 14-d experimental periods. Whole-body protein turnover was determined a t the end of the 14-d experimental period using [N-15]glycine as an oral tr acer. Nitrogen balance was 17 +/- 5 mg N/(kg fat-free mass . d) during the adaptive period. It was higher during the experimental period, but not sign ificantly different in the women fed the spread or the pulse patterns [59 /- 12 and 36 +/- 8 mg N/(kg fat-free mass . d) respectively]. No significan t effects of the protein feeding pattern were detected on either whole-body protein turnover [5.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 6.1 +/- 0.3 g protein/(kg fat-free mass d) for spread and pulse pattern, respectively] or whole-body protein synthe sis and protein breakdown. Thus, in young women, these protein feeding patt erns did not have significantly different effects on protein retention.