Background: In many areas of Europe iodine deficiency disorders still exist
. Urinary iodine excretion is a valuable tool in characterizing the iodine
supply of a population. However, there is a continuing discussion on the mo
st appropriate parameter to measure urinary iodine excretion.
Methods: In 247 children (ages 3-5 years) from six European centers, spot u
rine samples were analyzed for urinary iodine concentration and urinary iod
ine-creatinine ratio.
Results: The median values of urinary iodine concentration from the six cen
ters were very similar (90-106 mu g/l) corresponding to a normal or margina
l iodine supply according to the criteria of the World Health Organization.
However, the median values of the urinary iodine-creatinine ratio From the
six centers differed significantly (143-445 mu g/g, P < 0.001). The differ
ent results of the two urinary parameters to assess urinary iodine supply w
ere due to large significant differences in the urinary creatinine concentr
ation reported by the various centers, which probably reflect marked differ
ences in water intake.
Conclusions: iodine deficiency is still a significant health problem in man
y European countries. In comparable and homogeneous population subgroups (e
ven from different countries), the urinary iodine-creatinine ratio appears
to be a much better parameter for assessing iodine supply than urinary iodi
ne concentration. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.