Ne. Meagher et Ar. Anderson, Kinetics of the O(P-3)+N2O reaction. 2. Interpretation and recommended rate coefficients, J PHYS CH A, 104(25), 2000, pp. 6013-6031
The reaction O(P-3) + N2O is important to models of NOx pollutant and prope
llant chemistry and to the understanding of the thermal decomposition of N2
O, which has historically played a key role in the development of unimolecu
lar reaction theory. The reaction has two important product channels: O + N
2O --> NO + NO (Delta H-0 = -36 kcal/mol) (R1); O + N2O --> O-2 + Nz (Delta
H-0 = -79 kcal/mol) (R2). Rate coefficients of these reactions have been t
he subject of several reviews. However, clear reasons why many of the evalu
ated, nonretained data differ from recommendations have not previously been
known. There has been a great deal of controversy over the rate coefficien
ts, particularly for reaction R2. Here, the relevant data are critically ev
aluated using detailed chemical modeling as an important tool. The results
explain many of the discrepancies. Some of the data of central importance i
n earlier evaluations are shown to be incorrect. Additionally, some importa
nt features of the global behavior of the mixtures studied, which had previ
ously not been understood, are explained, and the possible effects of hypot
hetical H2O contamination on N2O shock tube studies was quantitatively inve
stigated. It is shown that the bulk of the rate coefficient results remaini
ng after the evaluations can be combined with the intermediate temperature
results for k(tot) = k(1) + k(2) from FGFAM (Fontijn, A.; Goumri, A.; Ferna
ndez, A.; Anderson, W. R.; Meagher, N. E. J. Phys. Chem., preceding paper i
n this issue) to obtain fitted recommendations: k(1) = 1.52 x 10(-10) exp(-
13 930/T) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) (1370-4080 K); k(2) = 6.13 x 10(-12) exp
(-8,020/T) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) (1075-3340 K). Until recently, it was b
elieved rate coefficients of the two product channels were approximately eq
ual over a very wide temperature range. In contrast, the present study has
led to the conclusion that reaction R2 dominates below, and reaction R1 abo
ve, 1840 K.