Objective: The pul pose of this study is provide an historical context for
current behavioral models of hypertension. Methods: A selective sample of t
he cardiovascular reactivity literature was reviewed, from 1932 to present.
Results: In the earliest model, cardiovascular reactivity was regarded as
a marker of disease risk; however, in later models, reactivity came to be v
iewed as a causal influence in the development of hypertension. As the mode
ls evolved, the underlying assumptions changed. Thus, the risk marker model
assumed that cardiovascular responses to stress were a stable, generalized
characteristic of the individual, and therefore the eliciting stimuli were
arbitrary. The later models, however, assume that the nature of the elicit
ing stimulus is a determinant of the cardiovascular response, We describe t
he increasing complexity of the four models, and contrast their underlying
assumptions and the implications of these assumptions. Conclusion: We provi
de an overview of study designs and variables that should be incorporated i
nto studies seeking to understand the ways in which cardiovascular response
s to stress may influence the development of hypertension. (C) 2000 Elsevie
r Science Inc. All rights reserved.