Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective

Authors
Citation
K. Falconer, Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective, J RURAL ST, 16(3), 2000, pp. 379-394
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
EnvirnmentalStudies Geografy & Development
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
ISSN journal
07430167 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
379 - 394
Database
ISI
SICI code
0743-0167(200007)16:3<379:FCOASP>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Voluntary agri-environmental schemes based on management agreements charact erise much agri-environmental policy across the EU at present, and have exp anded following the implementation of Regulation 2078/92 in all member stat es. Schemes generally motivate individual farmers to contract with governme nt agencies to produce countryside goods in return for compensatory payment s. Hence, farmers' decisions to participate are central to achieving policy objectives. An enhanced understanding of farmers' attitudes to and percept ions of schemes and their implementation would be of value for policy devel opment. Recent transactions-cost research has observed that such schemes in volve potentially heavy transactions costs, for both the state and farmers. In addition to reducing scheme cost-effectiveness, the transactions costs incurred by farmers can form a significant constraint on participation in s chemes, with adverse effects on the supply of conservation goods. This pape r considers behavioural and transactional perspectives on scheme participat ion. Some new data on the transactional burdens experienced by farmers when participating in schemes is examined from the perspective of identifying w ays to improve policy transacting to ease constraints on participation wher e these exist. At the level of the individual participant, the development of agri-environmental one-stop-shops in member states for all schemes would allow transactions-cost economies, saving on the overhead costs of applyin g to different schemes with different objectives, as well as allowing a mor e integrated, less confused approach to participation. The longer-term valu e of farmer networks and capacity-building for agri-environmental managemen t is important too. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.