Many researchers in psychology and physical activity have discussed the ove
rlap among control constructs in various theories. Skinner (1996) proposed
an integrative control framework based on an agent-means-ends distinction t
hat offered comparisons among and more explicit measurement of 3 control co
nstructs-control, capacity, and strategy beliefs. No study in the exercise
domain has yet empirically examined these advantages. This study evaluated
Skinner's framework relative to their contribution to predicting exercise a
ttendance. A prospective design was used to consider the potential change i
n the nature of the relationships. High correlations (range r = .52-.88) at
2 time points in the exercise program suggested overlap among control cons
tructs when using Skinner's measurement procedures. Only capacity beliefs a
nd behavioral intention were significantly related to exercise attendance (
model R-adjusted(2) = .11 and .16, p = .03 and .01, respectively, at onset
and midprogram). The findings do not support Skinner's contentions but are
similar to previous findings in the exercise literature.