Mt. Mandelson et al., Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers, J NAT CANC, 92(13), 2000, pp. 1081-1087
Background: Screening mammography is the best method to reduce mortality fr
om breast cancer, yet some breast cancers cannot be detected by mammography
, Cancers diagnosed after a negative mammogram are known as interval cancer
s. This study investigated whether mammographic breast density is related t
o the risk of interval cancer. Methods: Subjects were selected from women p
articipating in mammographic screening from 1988 through 1993 in a large he
alth maintenance organization based in Seattle, WA, Women were eligible for
the study if they had been diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast
cancer within 24 months of a screening mammogram and before a subsequent on
e. Interval cancer case subjects (n = 149) were women whose breast cancer o
ccurred after a negative or benign mammographic assessment. Screen-detected
control subjects (n = 388) were diagnosed after a positive screening mammo
gram, One radiologist, who was blinded to cancer status, assessed breast de
nsity by use of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting
and Data System. Results: Mammographic sensitivity (i.e., the ability of ma
mmography to detect a cancer) was 80% among women with predominantly fatty
breasts but just 30% in women with extremely dense breasts. The odds ratio
(OR) for interval cancer among women with extremely dense breasts was 6.14
(95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95-19.4), compared with women with extrem
ely fatty breasts, after adjustment for age at index mammogram, menopausal
status, use of hormone replacement therapy, and body mass index. When only
those interval cancer cases confirmed by retrospective review of index mamm
ograms were considered, the OR increased to 9.47 (95% CI = 2.78-32.3), Conc
lusion: Mammographic breast density appears to be a major risk factor for i
nterval cancer.