P. Pradat et al., Comparison between three quantitative assays in patients with chronic hepatitis C and their relevance in the prediction of response to therapy, J VIRAL HEP, 7(3), 2000, pp. 203-210
To compare three quantitative assays measuring viral load in patients with
chronic hepatitis C and to determine their value in predicting response to
interferon (IFN) therapy, we analysed serum from 896 patients from eight Eu
ropean Centres using QUANTIPLEX(TM) bDNA, MONITOR AMPLICOR(TM) and SUPERQUA
NT(TM) assays. Analyses were performed on the same sample. Viral genotype w
as assessed using INNO-LiPA HCV II kits. Intercentre variations were observ
ed that were related to the handling of specimens not processed and stored
within 6 h of blood sampling. Among sera with optimal handling, a stronger
correlation was observed between bDNA and SUPERQUANT (0.806) than between b
DNA and MONITOR (0.677) and between MONITOR and SUPERQUANT (0.632). These d
iscrepancies were greatest with genotype 2 (bDNA/SUPERQUANT= 0.772; bDNA/MO
NITOR=0.456; SUPERQUANT/MONITOR= 0.299). This correlation was influenced by
viraemia level and was better at lower viral loads. The proportion of sera
with undetectable viral load was 15% with bDNA, 9.7% with MONITOR and 7.7%
with SUPERQUANT. For the three measurements, the best cut-offs of sustaine
d response to IFN treatment were located at their detection threshold. Amon
g patients with viral load below the detection level, a sustained response
was observed in 35% tested with bDNA, 38% with MONITOR and 80% with SUPERQU
ANT. Hence a stronger correlation was observed between bDNA and SUPERQUANT
than between either of these assays and MONITOR. SUPERQUANT was the most se
nsitive assay and this greater sensitivity was associated with a better pre
dictive value of treatment response.