Mj. Heydon et Jc. Reynolds, Demography of rural foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in relation to cull intensity inthree contrasting regions of Britain, J ZOOL, 251, 2000, pp. 265-276
The impact of deliberate culling of fox populations has been much debated.
Although a local (< 10 km(2)) impact has been accepted, previous authors ha
ve denied that culling has any impact on a larger scale because local losse
s are compensated through immigration. Rather, it has been claimed that at
this scale fox density is determined by resources, mediated through social
behaviour and breeding suppression. We determined the impact of culling on
a regional scale (>1000 km(2)), using data on culling (Heydon & Reynolds, 2
000), fox density (Heydon, Reynolds & Short, 2000) and productivity. The th
ree U.K. study regions (size 1238-2322 km(2)) were in mid-Wales (A), the ea
st Midlands (B) and East Anglia (C). High productivity in regions A and C w
as associated with low density, high culling mortality and high overall mor
tality (all relative to region B), indicating that density was suppressed b
y culling. In region B (moderate) breeding suppression was associated with
a higher density and lower cull than in regions A and C, implying that fox
density was closer to the maximum sustainable by resources. We conclude tha
t the impact of culling in different regions of Britain is variable, depend
ent on the regional prevalence, methods, and history of culling. However, i
t is clear that in a range of circumstances culling can substantially depre
ss fox numbers, and that current fox densities reflect a history of culling
. This conclusion is fundamental in considering the management of fox preda
tion in farming and conservation contexts.