Objective: To determine the extent of and reasons for lost-to-follow-up, as
well as its impact on outcome studies in a cohort of lupus patients.
Methods: As of September 1991, 247 patients, in a cohort of 621 patients wi
th SLE, being followed in a long-term prognosis study, had not been since 1
March, 1990 and were considered lost-to-follow-up. Patients were contacted
and encouraged to return for an evaluation or to answer a questionnaire by
telephone. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the lost-to-follow-
up and non-lost-to-follow-up patients and the survival experience during th
e lost-to-follow-up period was compared with that when patients were not co
nsidered lost-to-follow-up, Estimated survival curves with and without the
information gained through contacts with lost-to-follow-up patients were co
mpared.
Results: Of the 247 patients, 29 have died, 66 returned for a full assessme
nt, 84 completed a questionnaire and 68 (11%) were true lost-to-follow-up.
The lost-to-follow-up patient group had 10% more Caucasians and 6% more mal
es than the patients under regular follow-up. The estimated survival curves
of the entire cohort with and without the new lost-to-follow-up data, calc
ulated as of July 1992, were very similar. There was no evidence of a diffe
rential mortality rate during the period in which patients were lost-to-fol
low-up. Some suggestive evidence that the relative mortality rate comparing
the rate during a period of lost-to-follow-up and during a period of activ
e follow-up may depend on disease duration at the lime of lost-to-follow-up
was found.
Conclusions: While it would be prudent to limit lost-to-follow-up as much a
s possible, especially for outcomes such as mortality which do not necessar
ily require a clinic visit, it does not appear that significant bias will b
e present in prospective studies based on our single clinic database. Since
the retrieved 179 lost-to-follow-up patients did not affect suvival studie
s it is likely that the 68 true lost-to-follow-up patients will also not ha
ve an impact on prognostic studies.