P. Goldblatt et M. Takei, CHROMOSOME CYTOLOGY OF IRIDACEAE - PATTERNS OF VARIATION, DETERMINATION OF ANCESTRAL BASE NUMBERS, AND MODES OF KARYOTYPE CHANGE, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 84(2), 1997, pp. 285-304
Against a background of 100 original counts for 95 species in 34 gener
a of Iridaceae, we review chromosome information for the entire family
. Counts are now available for some 1008 of the estimated 1750 species
of Iridaceae, and all but 5 of ca. 78 genera are known from at least
one count. me suggest ancestral base numbers far all genera known cyto
logically and outline patterns of cytological variation within the sub
families and tribes currently recognized. Polyploidy was evidently imp
ortant in the early diversification of Iridaceae, and many genera have
base numbers higher than I = 10. Neopolyploidy is important in Northe
rn Hemisphere genera, especially Iris and Crocus, but has an unusually
low frequency in Africa, the center of diversity for the family. Chan
ges in basic number, frequent in a few genera, are evidently tile resu
lt of dysploid reduction. In all but a few possible examples, correlat
ed morphological specialization suggests that dysploid reduction is in
volved in stepwise change in base number. Major dysploid series are re
stricted to a felv genera, including Romulea, the related Crocus, as w
ell as Gladiolus and Lapeirousia (ail Ixioideae), and Iris, Moraea, an
d Sisyrinchium (Iridoideae). All other genera have a single base numbe
r or limited variation evident in only one or two species. Patterns of
chromosomal variation are particularly complex in Iris and Crocus and
await detailed elucidation. More counts are needed in the Australian
Patersonia, the South American-Australasian Orthrosanthus, and the neo
tropical tribe Mariceae, for all of which ancestral base number remain
s uncertain and patterns of cytological variation appear complex.