Wj. Schwartz et al., Differential regulation of fos family genes in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial subdivisions of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus, NEUROSCIENC, 98(3), 2000, pp. 535-547
Extensive studies have established that light regulates c-fos gene expressi
on in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the site of an endogenous circadian cloc
k, but relatively little is known about the expression of genes structurall
y related to c-Sos, including fra-1, fra-2 and fosB. We analysed the photic
and temporal regulation of these genes at the messenger RNA and immunoreac
tive protein levels in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus, and we found different
expression patterns after photic stimulation and depending on location in t
he ventrolateral or dorsomedial subdivisions. In the ventrolateral suprachi
asmatic nucleus, c-fos, fra-2 and fosB expression was stimulated after a su
bjective-night (but not subjective-day) light pulse. Expression of the fra-
2 gene was prolonged following photic stimulation, with elevated messenger
RNA and protein levels that appeared unchanged for at least a few hours bey
ond the c-fos peak. Unlike c-fos and fra-2, the fosB gene appeared to be ex
pressed constitutively in the ventrolateral suprachiasmatic nucleus through
out the circadian cycle; immunohistochemical analysis suggested that Delta
FosB was the protein product accounting for this constitutive expression, w
hile FosB was induced by the subjective-night light pulse. In the dorsomedi
al suprachiasmatic nucleus, c-fos and fra-2 expression exhibited an endogen
ous circadian rhythm, with higher levels during the early subjective day, a
lthough the relative abundance was much lower than that measured after ligh
t pulses in the ventrolateral suprachiasmatic nucleus. Double-label immunoh
istochemistry suggested that some of the dorsomedial cells responsible for
the circadian expression of c-Fos also synthesized arginine vasopressin. No
evidence of suprachiasmatic nucleus fra-1 expression was found.
In summary, fos family genes exhibit differences in their specific expressi
on patterns in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, including their photic and circ
adian regulation in separate cell populations in the ventrolateral and dors
omedial subdivisions. The data, in combination with our previous results [T
akeuchi J. et al. (1993) Neuron 11, 825-836], suggest that activator protei
n-1 binding sites on ventrolateral suprachiasmatic nucleus target genes are
constitutively occupied by Delta FosB/JunD complexes, and that c-Fos, Fra-
2, FosB and JunB compete for binding after photic stimulation. The differen
tial regulation of fos family genes in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial su
prachiasmatic nucleus suggests that their circadian function(s) and downstr
eam target(s) are likely to be cell specific. (C) 2000 IBRO. Published by E
lsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.