Objective: To construct a model to estimate maternal body composition in la
te gestation using anthropometric measurements.
Methods: Twenty healthy pregnant women at 30 weeks' gestation had estimates
of body composition using hydrodensitometry, with corrections for residual
lung volume, and total body water using H-2 O-18 (development group). Tota
l body water was estimated from O-18 abundances measured by gas-isotope-rat
io mass spectrometry. Maternal age, height, weight, and seven skinfold site
s were correlated with fat mass using stepwise regression analysis. The ant
hropometric model to estimate fat mass was then tested prospectively in a s
econd group of 20 subjects and correlated with underwater weighing and tota
l body water measurements (validation group). Statistical analysis used chi
(2), paired t and Wilcoxon sign-rank tests.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in maternal de
mographics between groups. The fat mass of development group subjects using
underwater weighing and total body water was 22.7 +/- 7.6 kg. Using the de
velopment group, a model was derived that explained 91% of the variance in
fat mass by underwater weighing and total body water using maternal weight
and triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac skinfolds (r(2) = 0.91, P <.001).
When tested prospectively in the validation group, the correlation remained
statistically significant (r(2) = 0.89, P <.001). There was no statistical
ly significant (P =.88) difference between the anthropometric estimates of
fat mass and underwater weighing and total body water measurements (95% con
fidence interval -2.476, 2.748 kg of fat mass).
Conclusion: This anthropometric model can be used to predict maternal fat m
ass in late gestation. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:33-7. (C) 2000 by The Americ
an College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).