Objective: To assess the prevalence of reported ovarian cancer screening am
ong a population-based sample of women from Washington state and identify f
actors that influence the decision to be screened.
Methods: A population-based sample of 6749 women aged 54-84 years, living i
n 40 predominately rural communities in Washington state, was surveyed abou
t their utilization of ultrasonography and CA 125 for ovarian cancer screen
ing. We also assessed relevant demographic, family history, psychosocial, a
nd health behavior variables.
Results: After exclusions, data from 4938 respondents were available. Two p
ercent (n = 96) reported having been screened. Multiple logistic regression
identified ovarian cancer worry, contact with an obstetrician-gynecologist
, and family history of ovarian cancer as independently associated with scr
eening. Based on self-reported family histories, 27 women had pedigrees con
sistent with high risk of ovarian cancer, but none of those women reported
having been screened.
Conclusion: Ovarian cancer screening is rare. Women at high risk of it migh
t not be getting recommended screening. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:70-4. (C) 2
000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).