Trabeculectomy for acute primary angle closure

Citation
T. Aung et al., Trabeculectomy for acute primary angle closure, OPHTHALMOL, 107(7), 2000, pp. 1298-1302
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
01616420 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1298 - 1302
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(200007)107:7<1298:TFAPAC>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Obiective: To analyze the results of trabeculectomy performed for all cases of acute primary angle closure (APAC). Design: Participants: To analyze the results of trabeculectomy performed fo r all cases of acute primary angle closure Retrospective, noncomparative ca se series Participants: Fifty-six consecutive patients who underwent trabeculectomy f or APAC at two Singapore centers from 1993 through 1995. Methods: The conventional treatment for APAC is to lower intraocular pressu re (IOP) medically, after which laser peripheral iridotomy (PI) is performe d. However, in Asian eyes, the acute attack is often refractory to standard treatment. Trabeculectomy is occasionally performed on eyes that do not re spond to medical therapy, as well as eyes with APAC that respond to medical therapy but are assessed as having underlying chronic angle-closure glauco ma. In such cases, laser PI is not performed before trabeculectomy. Main Outcome Measures: The surgical outcome was assessed in terms of final IOP and the incidence of complications. Success was defined as final IOP le ss than 21 mmHg without medication, and qualified success was defined as fi nal IOP less than 21 mmHg with medication. Patients whose IOP was more than 21 mmHg, required further glaucoma surgery, lost light perception, or whos e eye became phthisical were classified as failures. Results: The mean follow up was 22 months (range, 6-42 months). In group A, the medical failure group (n = 32), success in IOP control was obtained in 18 patients (56.2%), qualified success was achieved in 3 patients (9.4%), and failure resulted in 11 patients (34.4%). Ten patients (31.3%) encounter ed early postoperative complications such as shallow anterior chamber. In g roup B, the medical success group (n = 24), success in IOP control was achi eved in 21 patients (87.5%), qualified success was achieved in 3 patients ( 12.5%), and there were no cases of failure. The incidence of postoperative complications was low (4 eyes [16.7%]). In terms of IOP outcome, trabeculec tomy outcome was significantly worse in group A (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). Conclusions: Because there is a high risk of surgical failure and complicat ions, trabeculectomy may not be the procedure of choice in medically unresp onsive cases of APAC. (C) 2000 by fhe American Academy of Ophthalmology.