Ks. Renzaglia et al., Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implicationsfor a unified phylogeny, PHI T ROY B, 355(1398), 2000, pp. 769-793
Citations number
130
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Experimental Biology
Journal title
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
As the oldest extant lineages of land plants, bryophytes provide a living l
aboratory in which to evaluate morphological adaptations associated with ea
rly land existence. In this paper we examine reproductive and structural in
novations in the gametophyte and sporophyte generations of hornworts, liver
worts, mosses and basal pteridophytes. Reproductive features relating to sp
ermatogenesis and the architecture of motile male gametes are overviewed an
d evaluated from an evolutionary perspective. Phylogenetic analyses of a da
ta set derived from spermatogenesis and one derived from comprehensive morp
hogenetic data are compared with a molecular analysis of nuclear and mitoch
ondrial small subunit rDNA sequences.
Although relatively small because of a reliance on water for sexual reprodu
ction, gametophytes of bryophytes are the most elaborate of those produced
by any land plant. Phenotypic variability in gametophytic habit ranges from
leafy to thalloid forms with the greatest diversity exhibited by hepatics.
Appendages, including leaves, slime papillae and hairs, predominate in liv
erworts and mosses, while hornwort gametophytes are strictly thalloid with
no organized external structures. Internalization of reproductive and veget
ative structures within mucilage-filled spaces is an adaptive strategy exhi
bited by hornworts. The formative stages of gametangial development are sim
ilar in the three bryophyte groups, with the exception that in mosses apica
l growth is intercalated into early organogenesis, a feature echoed in moss
sporophyte ontogeny.
A monosporangiate, unbranched sporophyte typifies bryophytes, but developme
ntal and structural innovations suggest the three bryophyte groups diverged
prior to elaboration of this generation. Sporophyte morphogenesis in hornw
orts involves non-synchronized sporogenesis and the continued elongation of
the single sporangium, features unique among archegoniates. In hepatics, e
longation of the sporophyte seta and archegoniophore is rapid and requires
instantaneous wall expandability and hydrostatic support. Unicellular, spir
alled elaters and capsule dehiscence through the formation of four regular
valves are autapomorphies of liverworts. Sporophytic sophistications in the
moss clade include conducting tissue, stomata, an assimilative layer and a
n elaborate peristome for extended spore dispersal. Characters such as stom
ata and conducting cells that are shared among sporophytes of mosses, hornw
orts and pteridophytes are interpreted as parallelisms and not homologies.
Our phylogenetic analysis of three different data sets is the most comprehe
nsive to date and points to a single phylogenetic solution for the evolutio
n of basal embryophytes. Hornworts are supported as the earliest divergent
embryophyte clade with a moss/liverwort clade sister to tracheophytes. Amon
g pteridophytes, lycophytes are monophyletic and an assemblage containing f
erns, Equisetum and psilophytes is sister to seed plants. Congruence betwee
n morphological and molecular hypotheses indicates that these data sets are
tracking the same phylogenetic signal and reinforces our phylogenetic conc
lusions. It appears that total evidence approaches are valuable in resolvin
g ancient radiations such as those characterizing the evolution of early em
bryophytes. More information on land plant phylogeny can be found at: http:
//www.science.siu.edu/landplants/index.html.