The authors reviewed the most recent U.S. Supreme Court holdings regarding
sexual harassment (SH) and compared them to legal commentators' calls for r
eform in the law. Because the courts have ignored empirical evidence, and a
greement among social forces is lacking, the judiciary has been unable to s
end a unified message to regulate social sexual misconduct at work. This an
alysis of recent social science research suggests that the a more thorough
understanding of the fundamentals of SH law is needed. The authors' psychol
egal analysis of SH policy adopts the interdisciplinary point of view calle
d social analytic jurisprudence. They summarized some of the empirical find
ings guided by that perspective and concluded with a set of empirical resea
rch questions, the answers to which bring one a more interdisciplinary unde
rstanding of social sexual conduct at work.