Two models, a Poisson race model and a diffusion model, are fit to data fro
m a perceptual matching task. In each model, information about the similari
ty or the difference between two stimuli accumulates toward thresholds for
either response. Stimulus variables are assumed to influence the rate at wh
ich information accumulates, and response variables are assumed to influenc
e the level of the response thresholds. Three experiments were conducted to
assess the performance of each model. In Experiment 1, observers performed
under different response deadlines; in Experiment 2, response bias was man
ipulated by changing the relative frequency of same and different stimuli.
Ln Experiment 3, stimulus pairs were presented at three eccentricities: fov
eal, parafoveal, and peripheral. We examined whether the race and diffusion
models could fit the response time and accuracy data through changes only
in response parameters (for Experiments 1 and 2) or stimulus parameters (fo
r Experiment 3). Comparisons between the two models suggest that the race m
odel, which has not been studied extensively, can account for perceptual ma
tching data at least as well as the diffusion model. Furthermore, without t
he constraints on the parameters provided by the experimental conditions, t
he diffusion and the race models are indistinguishable. This finding emphas
izes the importance of fitting models across several conditions and imposin
g logical psychological constraints on the parameters of models.