Af. Aburahma et al., Perioperative and late stroke rates of carotid endarterectomy contralateral to carotid artery occlusion - Results from a randomized trial, STROKE, 31(7), 2000, pp. 1566-1571
Background and Purpose-Several previous studies have reported the benefits
of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) contralateral to carotid occlusion with mix
ed results, but none of these were randomized except for the North American
Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. The purpose of this study was to
analyze the results of surgery in patients with contralateral carotid arte
ry occlusion in a randomized trial in which randomization was done accordin
g to the method of closure.
Methods-In 399 CEAs (357 patients) that were randomized into primary closur
e versus patching, 49 had contralateral occlusion. Strokes were designated
as ipsilateral if they arose from the same CEA side and contralateral if th
ey arose from the occluded side. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estima
te perioperative strokes and stroke-free survival in patients with contrala
teral occlusion (group A) versus those without contralateral occlusion (gro
up B).
Results-Demographic characteristics and mean follow-up for both groups were
similar (group A, 40 months; group B, 33 months). Group A had a higher inc
idence of contralateral transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (12.2% versus 0.9
%; P<0.0001), contralateral strokes (2% versus 0%; P=0.025), and combined c
ontralateral TIAs/strokes (14.3% versus 0.9%; P<0.0001). The rates for peri
operative and all strokes (operative and late) were 2% and 4.1% (2% ipsilat
eral and 2% contralateral strokes) for group A and 2.9% and 3.4% (all ipsil
ateral) for group B (P=0.60 and 0.85, respectively). The rates for perioper
ative and all TIAs were 0% and 14.3% for group A versus 2.6% and 6.3% for g
roup B (P=0.918 and P=0.08, respectively). The rates for perioperative and
all neurological events (TLA and stroke) were 2% and 18.4% for group A and
5.3% and 9.7% for group B (P=0.27 and 0.113, respectively). The cumulative
stroke-free survival rates at 5 years were 84% for group A and 77% for grou
p B (P>0.1). The cumulative stroke-free survival rates at 5 years for sympt
omatic and asymptomatic patients in group A and group B were also similar.
The perioperative and late deaths were similar for both groups (group A, 8%
; group B, 14%).
Conclusions-Group A had a higher incidence of contralateral TIAs and stroke
s than group B; however, the perioperative and all late stroke rates and su
rvival rates of CEA were comparable in patients with and without contralate
ral occlusion.