T. Nakazawa et al., COMPARISON OF THE GYRO-C1E3 AND BIOMEDICUS-CENTRIFUGAL-PUMP PERFORMANCES DURING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, Artificial organs, 21(7), 1997, pp. 782-785
The compact eccentric inlet port (C1E3) centrifugal blood pump was dev
eloped as a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) pump. The C1E3 pump incorpora
ted a seal-less design with a blood stagnation free structure. The pum
p impeller was magnetically coupled to the driver magnet in a seal-les
s manner. To develop an atraumatic and antithrombogenic centrifugal pu
mp without a shaft seal junction, a double pivot bearing system was in
troduced. Recently, a mass production model of the C1E3 was fabricated
and evaluated. The ratio of the normalized index of hemolysis (NIH) o
f the C1E3 was 0.007 g/100 L, in comparison to the NIH of the BP-80, 0
.018 g/100 L, each in a CPB condition of 5 L/min against 325 mm Hg. Bo
th pumps were compared in identical in vitro circuits. To further eval
uate the pumps during cardiopulmonary bypass for reliability and funct
ion, 6 h of CPB was performed on each of 8 bovines using either the C1
E3 or BP-80 centrifugal pump. The BP-80 and C1E3 provided pump flows o
f 50-60 ml/kg/min without incident. The hemodynamics were stable, and
the hematology and biochemistry data were within normal ranges. There
were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Co
ncerning the plasma free hemoglobin values, a mass production model of
the C1E3 pump had the same hemolysis levels as the BP-80. Our prelimi
nary studies reveal that the C1E3 pump is reliable. Also, the C1E3 wil
l satisfy clinical requirements as a cardiopulmonary bypass pump.