Comparison of statistical methods for estimation of nutrient load to surface reservoirs for sparse data set: Application with a modified model for phosphorus availability
B. Mukhopadhyay et Eh. Smith, Comparison of statistical methods for estimation of nutrient load to surface reservoirs for sparse data set: Application with a modified model for phosphorus availability, WATER RES, 34(12), 2000, pp. 3258-3268
Nutrient budget models for lakes and reservoirs critically respond to the i
nput pollutant loading, yet little consensus exists on how to estimate the
load, particularly for the common but challenging case of sparse nutrient c
oncentration measurements and abundant input flow data. A statistical load
calculation using cluster (in this case, annual) mean concentration and str
atified (monthly) flow was compared to estimates by sample mean and ratio e
stimator methods for phosphorus loading to Whitney Reservoir in North Centr
al Texas. The results varied considerably for the various estimator methods
during the six-year study period with the cluster and stratified mean appr
oach estimating extreme high loading periods not captured by the other meth
ods. The variable loading patterns were then tested in phosphorus budget mo
del simulations for Whitney Reservoir that considered vertical stratificati
on of the water column, water-sediment phosphorus interaction, and seasonal
variations in water quality. For independently determined settling,interla
yer dispersion, recycling rates, and sediment burial rates estimated for th
e respective loading calculation, the cluster and stratified mean loading p
attern provided a batter statistical fit of phosphorus concentration measur
ements in the epilimnion than when ratio estimator load calculations were u
sed. The two loading functions described hypolimnion concentration data equ
ally well. The lesson of this exercise is that various methods of load esti
mation should be examined in order to develop as reliable a management mode
l as possible when only a sparse data set is available for calibration. (C)
2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.