Survey effort effects on power to detect trends in raptor migration counts

Citation
Sa. Lewis et Wr. Gould, Survey effort effects on power to detect trends in raptor migration counts, WILDL SOC B, 28(2), 2000, pp. 317-329
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
ISSN journal
00917648 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
317 - 329
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7648(200022)28:2<317:SEEOPT>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Tremendous effort is expended in counting migrant raptors in North America, where over 1,500 count sites exist. The Biological Resources Division of t he United States Geological Survey is investigating whether migration count s can serve to monitor population trends. To that end, we investigated the effects of changes in survey duration on power to detect trends using vario us sample sizes, lengths of surveys, and sampling frequencies within a seas on based on raptor migration count data collected from 7 sites. As expected , power to detect trends increased as sample size (number of years of count s) increased; its magnitude depended on level of trend and variation in ann ual counts. Except for cases with extremely low or high power, 5 additional survey years increased power 20%-50%. Changing survey length affected powe r, but results varied and depended on the migration pattern of species at s pecific sites. Power to detect trends did not change appreciably when count s were conducted only during 90 days of peak migration (for all species com bined). However, when annual counts were based on 30 or 60 consecutive days of peak migration, we found decreases in power for most site-species combi nations. Changing the number of days counted during the week resulted in va riable changes in power. Our results suggest the number of count days withi n weeks necessary for sufficient monitoring should be evaluated on a site- and species-specific basis. We determined that a coefficient of variation o f 30% or less in annual counts is needed to detect a 3% average annual decr ease in counts over 25 years with at least 80% power. This requirement was met at one or more sites for 14 of 20 raptor species. Power to detect incre asing trends exceeded power to detect decreasing trends, which is unfortuna te from a conservation perspective. Nevertheless, if count data are collect ed consistently, large-scale population trends for some raptor species may be monitored effectively using migration counts.