Bw. Park et al., Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: The importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection, YONSEI MED, 41(3), 2000, pp. 312-318
Of 489 asymptomatic women who were referred to our institute from other scr
eening clinics, 46 were eventually proven to be breast cancer patients, and
this number equated to 8.1% of the 565 breast cancer patients treated in o
ur institute during the period of January 1997 to December 1998. Among the
46 cancer patients of the initial 489 asymptomatic women, twenty-five (54.3
5%) were detected by mammogram alone, six (13.04%) by clinical breast exami
nation (CBE) alone, and the remaining 15 (32.61%) by both mammogram and CBE
. In context with age, the mammographic sensitivity for cancer detection wa
s 100% for women aged over 60, 91% for 50s, 78.9% for 40s, and 75% for 30s,
and inversely correlated with the patient's age. Among the 25 cancers dete
cted by mammogram alone, 18 (72%) belonged to DCIS or stage I. In contrast,
four (66.7%) of six cancers detected by CBE alone and nine (60%) of 15 can
cers by both CBE and mammography were included in stage IIa or IIb. However
, the total incidence of early cancers (stages 0 and I) was significantly h
igher in the screening group than in the symptomatic group (p < 0.01). Thes
e results suggest that the role of mammography is important in the detectio
n of cancers in their earlier stage and CBE is helpful in reducing false ne
gative results in breast cancer screening. In conclusion, film mammography
is the best tool for the detection of microcalcification and is useful for
the detection of earlier lesions, but is not perfect for the detection of b
reast cancer particularly in young women. A careful CBE is an essential par
t of breast screening in order to reduce false-negative results.