dA conceptual framework is presented to help the reader understand some con
troversies in the hypnosis literature and a means of understanding some imp
ortant differences and disagreements in the field. It is this author's view
that hypnotic behavior can be understood as a complex mix of four conceptu
al (and empirical) independent dimensions: expectations, akin to the placeb
o response in clinical technique; suggestion; a cognitive component includi
ng relaxation, imagery in all modalities, and trance logic; dissociation, w
hich is seen as the key component of deep hypnosis, and which may involve i
ndividual differences in the flexible control of experience.