S. Ruf et H. Pancherz, Does bite-jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients, ANGL ORTHOD, 70(3), 2000, pp. 183-199
The aim of this prospective longitudinal study of 62 consecutively treated
Class II malocclusions was to determine whether bite-jumping causes temporo
mandibular disorders (TMD). The function of the temporomandibular joint (TM
J) was assessed anamnestically, clinically, and by means of magnetic resona
nce images (MRIs) taken before (TI), after (T2), and 1 year after (T3) Herb
st treatment. Average treatment time with the Herbst appliance was 7.2 mont
hs. In all subjects, Herbst treatment resulted in a Class I or overcorrecte
d Class I dental arch relationship. Thereafter, treatment was continued wit
h a multibracket appliance. The condyle was positioned significantly forwar
d during treatment but returned to its original position after removal of t
he Herbst appliance. A temporary capsulitis of the inferior stratum of the
posterior attachment was induced during treatment. Over the entire observat
ion period from before treatment to 1 year after treatment, bite-jumping wi
th the Herbst appliance: (1) did not result in any muscular TMD; (2) reduce
d the prevalence of capsulitis and structural condylar bony changes; (3) di
d not induce disc displacement in subjects with a physiologic pretreatment
disc position; (4) resulted in a stable repositioning of the disc in subjec
ts with a pretreatment partial disc displacement with reduction; and (5) co
uld not recapture the disc in subjects with a pretreatment total disc displ
acement with or without reduction. A pretreatment total disc displacement w
ith or without reduction did not, however, seem to be a contraindication fo
r Herbst treatment, In conclusion, bite-jumping using the Herbst appliance
does not have a deleterious effect on TMJ function and does not induce TMD
on a short-term basis.