Effectiveness and costs of omeprazole vs ranitidine for treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care clinics in West Virginia

Citation
B. Kaplan-machlis et al., Effectiveness and costs of omeprazole vs ranitidine for treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care clinics in West Virginia, ARCH FAM M, 9(7), 2000, pp. 624-630
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10633987 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
624 - 630
Database
ISI
SICI code
1063-3987(200007)9:7<624:EACOOV>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Objective: To compare clinical, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and medical cost outcomes in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) receiving omeprazole sodium or ranitidine hydrochloride trea tment. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, medical effectiveness trial conducted in 5 university-based family medicine clinics. Two hundred sixty -eight patients with GERD were recruited and randomly assigned to omeprazol e sodium, 20 mg once daily, or ranitidine hydrochloride, 150 mg twice daily , for up to 6 months. Main outcome assessments included the Gastrointestina l Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Reflux score, Psychological General Well-Bein g Index, and Short-form-36 Health Survey administered at baseline and 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Medical resource use and cost data were collected. Results: More omeprazole-treated patients reported improved heartburn resol ution at 2 weeks (49.0% vs 33.3%; P=.007) and 4 weeks (58.6% vs 35.0%; P<.0 01) compared with ranitidine-treated patients. The GSRS Reflux scores acros s 3 months showed overall differences between omeprazole (mean, 2.67) and r anitidine (mean, 2.95) groups (P=.04). Mean total 6-month medical costs wer e $915 lower ($8371 vs $9286; P=.64), and no difference in mean outpatient medical costs ($1198 vs $1158; P=.76) were observed in the omeprazole group compared with the ranitidine group. A post hoc secondary analysis showed t hat, at 12 and 24 weeks, patients treated with omeprazole for 8 weeks or mo re reported greater heartburn resolution tie, 24 [43%] of 56 patients at bo th intervals) than patients treated with ranitidine for 8 weeks or more (12 [24%] and 13 [26%] of 50 patients, respectively; P=.001). Conclusions: Ranitidine and omeprazole were both effective at improving hea rtburn symptoms; however, omeprazole provided greater resolution of heartbu rn symptoms at 2 and 4 weeks. Despite omeprazole's higher acquisition cost, there were no significant differences in total or outpatient costs between groups.