College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: Solid tumor prognostic factors - Which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation
Meh. Hammond et al., College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: Solid tumor prognostic factors - Which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation, ARCH PATH L, 124(7), 2000, pp. 958-965
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
The College of American Pathologists convened a prognostic factor conferenc
e in tune 1999 to consider prognostic and predictive factors in breast, col
on, and prostate cancer, and to stratify these factors into categories refl
ecting the strength of published evidence. Because so little progress in pr
ognostic factor clinical utility has been made in the last 5 years, the con
ference participants focused their attention on decreasing variation in met
hods, interpretation, and reporting of these factors so that greater clarit
y of value could be achieved. The conference was organized to promote discu
ssion, broad input, and future planning. An initial plenary session provide
d an overview of the status of tumor marker research, the impact of variati
on in medicine and pathology, and statistical issues related to prognostic
factor research. In working group sessions for each cancer type, participan
ts interactively evaluated and refined the documents created by the expert
panels. A second plenary session dealt with issues common to all 3 groups,
including the problem of micrometastases in lymph nodes in these sites; sta
tistical issues that arose during the breakout discussions; and issues of v
ariation in methods, interpretation, and reporting of immunohistochemical a
ssays. A faculty session brainstormed strategies that could be used to impl
ement the changes recommended. This session included invited representative
s of the Food and Drug Administration, Health Care Financing Administration
, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Am
erican Joint Committee on Cancer, and International Union Against Cancer. C
ancer site and general recommendations were presented and discussed during
a final session to achieve consensus of the conference participants and to
address feasibility of implementation of these recommendations. A final dis
cussion focused on future initiatives that might lead to implementation of
the changes proposed in the conference by the various organizations represe
nted. This report summarizes the general conference recommendations, cancer
working group recommendations, and plans for implementation of the recomme
ndations.