Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in the Sudan: clinical presentation and differential diagnosis

Citation
Ee. Zijlstra et al., Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in the Sudan: clinical presentation and differential diagnosis, BR J DERM, 143(1), 2000, pp. 136-143
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00070963 → ACNP
Volume
143
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
136 - 143
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0963(200007)143:1<136:PDLITS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a common complication followi ng kala-azar (visceral leishmaniasis). In a prospective study in a village in the endemic area for kala-azar in the Sudan, 105 of 183 (57%) kala-azar patients developed PKDL. There was a significantly higher PKDL rate (69%) i n those who received inadequate and irregular treatment of kala-azar than i n those who were treated with stibogluconate 20 mg kg(-1) daily for 15 days (35%). The group of patients who developed PKDL did not differ from those who did not develop PKDL with regard to age and sex distribution, reduction in spleen size, and conversion in the leishmanin skin test (LST). In a cli nical study, 416 PKDL patients were analysed and divided according to grade of severity. Severe PKDL was more frequent in younger age groups (P < 0.00 1); there was an inverse correlation between grade and conversion in the LS T (P < 0.01). In 16% of patients tested, parasites were demonstrated in ing uinal lymph node or bone marrow aspirates, indicating still visceral diseas e (para-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis); there was no correlation between t he presence of parasites and grade of severity. Conversion rates in the LST were lower than in those who did not have demonstrable parasites (11% and 37%, respectively; P < 0.01). In the absence of reliable and practical diag nostic tests, PKDL may be diagnosed on clinical grounds and differentiated from other conditions, of which miliaria rubra was the most common. Differe ntiation from leprosy was most difficult.