A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour

Citation
Lc. Sadler et al., A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour, BR J OBST G, 107(7), 2000, pp. 909-915
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
ISSN journal
14700328 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
909 - 915
Database
ISI
SICI code
1470-0328(200007)107:7<909:ARCTAM>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Objective To test whether a policy of active management of nulliparous labo ur would reduce the rate of caesarean section and prolonged labour without influencing maternal satisfaction. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Tertiary referral obstetric unit, Auckland, New Zealand. Population Nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term with singleton p regnancy and cephalic presentation and without fetal distress. Methods After the onset of active labour, previously consented women were r andomly assigned to active management (n = 320) or to routine care (n = 331 ). Active labour was defined as regular painful contractions, occurring at least once in five minutes, lasting at least 40 seconds, accompanied by eit her spontaneous rupture of the membranes, or full cervical effacement and d ilatation of at least two centimetres. Active management included early amn iotomy, two-hourly vaginal assessments, and early use of high dose oxytocin for slow progress in labour. Routine care was not prespecified. Prolonged labour was > 12 hours duration. Maternal satisfaction with labour care was assessed by postal questionnaire at six weeks postpartum. Main outcome measures Mode of delivery, duration of labour, and maternal sa tisfaction. Results Active management of labour did not reduce the rate of caesarean se ction 30/320 (9.4%), compared with 32/331 (9.7%) for routine care, but did shorten the length of first stage of labour (median 240 min vs 290 min; P = 0.02), and reduce the relative risk of prolonged labour (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0 .22, 0.71). There were no differences between groups in the rates of newbor n nursery admission, neonatal acidosis, low Apgar scores, or postpartum hae morrhage. Satisfaction with labour care was high (77%) and did not differ b etween groups. Conclusions Active management of labour reduced the duration of the first s tage of labour without affecting the rate of caesarean section, maternal sa tisfaction, or other maternal or newborn morbidity.