This paper examines the implications of the rise of restorative justice in
criminal justice practice and discourse and whether a unified approach to c
riminal justice based on restorative justice is desirable or possible. Pure
and partial theories of restorative justice are examined with an emphasis
on the relation between restorative and retributive theories of justice. Th
e author examines the hypothesis that restorative justice could contribute
to a process of net widening. Concluding that popular ideas In criminal jus
tice will by definition mean different things to different people, the auth
or explores different approaches to restorative justice including those whi
ch stress the accountability of offenders, the rehabilitation of offenders
and the crime prevention effects of restorative justice. The author also ex
amines the various constituencies of restorative justice including the priv
ate or quasi-public sector criminal justice professionals, crime victims, w
omen and aboriginal peoples. The relation between restorative justice and t
he criminalization of politics is also assessed with special attention to t
he relation between restorative and aboriginal justice and the larger decol
onialization project. The author concludes with some thoughts on the causes
of the rise and the possible fall of restorative justice.