Fast-acting insulin analog (lispro insulin), as well as slow/fast-acting an
alog mixtures (NPL-lispro insulin) allow a better control df postprandial g
lycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients (35% mean reduction in area
under curve for postprandial glycemia, 2 mmol/l reduction in postprandial g
lucose peak), as compared with regular insullin or conventional mixtures of
NPH and regular insulin. Analog pharmacokinetics allow to precede to insul
in injection immediately before meal, which is convenient for the patients.
When used alone, lispro insulin has no impact on basal glycemia, whereas t
wice daily injections of NPL-lispro mixtures allow a 1.8 mmol/l mean reduct
ion of basal glycemia, as compared with conventional mixtures, meaning a mo
re specific effect of NPL intermediate insulin. Other premeal blood glucose
levels (lunch and dinner) are not improved by lispro insulin. Most studies
did not establish a clear reduction in HbA1c with insulin analogs. When th
is is the case, this reduction averages 1.5% and could be more frequently o
bserved in studies dealing with type 2 diabetic patients. Finally, the redu
ced incidence of delayed hypoglycemic episodes, which is one of the most at
tractive effects of insulin analogs, was only reported in a minority of stu
dies. Surprisingly, the reduction of hypoglycemia incidence with analogs wa
s more frequently reported in type 2 diabetics than in type 1 patients. Thu
s fast-acting insulin analogs feature interesting characteristics, notewort
hy immediate premeal injection and a better postprandial glucose control. H
owever, it is established that the determination of diabetes complications
(particularly microangiopathy) mostly relies on average glucose control and
not solely on postprandial glycemia. Indeed, most studies suggest that ins
ulin analogs are at least as efficient as conventional insulins on HbA1c, b
ut possibly not more.