K. Fujioka et al., Weight loss with sibutramine improves glycaemic control and other metabolic parameters in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, DIABET OB M, 2(3), 2000, pp. 175-187
Aim: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of sibutramine hydrochlorid
e in obese patients whose type 2 diabetes was poorly controlled on diet alo
ne or with an oral antidiabetic agent
Methods: This study was a 24-week, double-blind, multicentre trial followin
g a B-week placebo run-in period. One hundred and seventy-five obese (body
mass index (b.m.i.) greater than or equal to 27 kg/m(2)) patients with poor
ly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized either to sibutramin
e (n = 89; mean age 53.5 years; mean weight 99.3 kg) or placebo (n = 86; me
an age 55 years; mean weight 98.2 kg) at 16 participating centres. To achie
ve moderate calorie restriction (deficit greater than or equal to 250-500 k
cal/day), individual dietary counselling was accompanied by either placebo
or sibutramine (initial dosage of 5 mg/day titrated up by 5 mg biweekly thr
ough week 6, and maintained at 20 mg through week 24). The main outcome mea
sures included changes in weight, b.m.i., waist and hip circumference, glyc
aemic control, lipid profile, and quality of life, and evaluation of report
ed adverse events.
Results: Sixty-seven per cent of sibutramine patients and 71% of placebo pa
tients completed the study. At week 24 when comparing those who completed t
he course, sibutramine compared with placebo patients showed significantly
greater (p < 0.001) absolute (-4.3 vs. -0.4 kg) and percentage (-4.5% vs. -
0.5%) weight loss. Weight loss greater than or equal to 5% or 10% was achie
ved by 33% and 8% of sibutramine patients, respectively, but no placebo pat
ients (p < 0.03 or better). Improvement in glycaemic control was correlated
with weight loss (p < 0.001). In 5% and 10% weight-loss responders, mean t
reatment differences were -0.53% and -1.65% (p less than or equal to 0.05),
respectively, for HbA(1c), and -1.4 mmol/l (p less than or equal to 0.05)
and -3.8 (p less than or equal to 0.05) mmol/l for fasting plasma glucose.
Sibutramine patients also showed improvements in fasting insulin, triglycer
ides, HDL cholesterol, and quality-of-life assessments. Overall, sibutramin
e was well tolerated compared with the placebo. Sibutramine treatment was a
ssociated with small mean increases in blood pressure (BP) and pulse, altho
ugh an increase in BP was not seen in sibutramine-treated patients who lost
greater than or equal to 5% of their weight.
Conclusions: Sibutramine produced statistically and clinically significant
weight loss when used in combination with recommendations for moderate calo
ric restriction. This weight loss was associated with improvements in metab
olic control and quality of life, and sibutramine was generally well tolera
ted in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.