Urban governance and economic development - A critique of Merseyside and Objective 1 status

Authors
Citation
P. Boland, Urban governance and economic development - A critique of Merseyside and Objective 1 status, EUR URB R S, 7(3), 2000, pp. 211-222
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
EnvirnmentalStudies Geografy & Development
Journal title
EUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES
ISSN journal
09697764 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
211 - 222
Database
ISI
SICI code
0969-7764(200007)7:3<211:UGAED->2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
In recent years there has been an accelerating academic interest in the coh erence of European regional policy, particularly in relation to the local a pplication of Structural Funds. In tandem there has also been an increasing importance attached to the governance of regions and localities. This arti cle fuses these two sets of debates in critically examining European Object ive I support for Merseyside in the UK. Merseyside was an Objective I regio n for the 1994-1999 programming period, and this article traces some of the fundamental fault lines in the design and delivery of its Single Programmi ng Document - the strategy and resource framework accompanying Structural F unding. It therefore provides some instructive lessons for the 2000-2006 UK -based Objective I regions: Merseyside (receiving its second tranche of sup port) and the new recipients of Cornwall and Scilly, South Yorkshire, and W est Wales and the Valleys.