A. Shahbazian et P. Holzer, Regulation of guinea pig intestinal peristalsis by endogenous endothelin acting at ETB receptors, GASTROENTY, 119(1), 2000, pp. 80-88
Background & Aims: Endothelins are expressed in many enteric neurons of the
gut. Because activation of endothelin ETA and ETB receptors is known to al
ter intestinal muscle activity, the effect of ETA and ETB receptor agonists
and antagonists on propulsive peristalsis was examined, Methods: Repetitiv
e peristalsis in fluid-perfused segments of the guinea pig isolated small i
ntestine was elicited by a rise of the intraluminal pressure and recorded v
ia the pressure changes generated by the peristaltic waves. Results: Endoth
elin 1 (0.3-10 nmol/L added to the organ bath) stimulated peristalsis as sh
own by a decrease in the pressure threshold at which peristaltic waves were
triggered, whereas the endothelin analog sarafotoxin 6c (0.3-10 nmol/L) in
hibited peristalsis as reflected by an increase in the pressure threshold.
The ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 (3 mu mol/L) converted the properistalti
c action of endothelin 1 to an antiperistaltic action, whereas the ETB rece
ptor antagonist BQ-788 (3 mu mol/L) prevented the antiperistaltic action of
sarafotoxin 6c. BQ-788, but not BQ-123, facilitated peristalsis on its own
, Additional experiments indicated that the properistaltic action of endoth
elin 1 is mediated by enteric neurons, whereas the peristaltic motor effect
s of sarafotoxin 6c and BQ-788 are caused by a direct action on the muscle.
Conclusions: ETA receptor activation stimulates, whereas ETB, receptor act
ivation inhibits, intestinal peristalsis. The ability of BQ-788 to facilita
te peristalsis per se points to a physiologic role of ETB receptors in peri
staltic motor regulation.