Se. Bunn et Pm. Davies, Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrity, HYDROBIOL, 422, 2000, pp. 61-70
Although biomonitoring approaches are being increasingly used in the measur
ement of stream and river health, critical assumptions about the nature of
biological populations and communities that underpin them are often ignored
. Many approaches based on pattern detection in plant and animal communitie
s assume high temporal persistence in the absence of anthropogenic disturba
nces. However, this has been rarely tested with long-term data sets and the
re is evidence that this assumption is not true in some river systems. Biol
ogical processes, such as predation and recruitment, can account for consid
erable spatial and temporal variation in the structure of some stream commu
nities. These processes may prevent the development of robust predictive mo
dels or indices based on pattern detection. Measurements of population or c
ommunity attributes also are often used to infer ecosystem processes, yet t
he link between pattern and process has rarely been demonstrated. Many goal
s of river management relate to the maintenance of natural ecological proce
sses and ecosystem function; direct measurement of these processes is, howe
ver, often neglected in assessment programs. Such measures are often sensit
ive to causal factors that are known to affect river health and it is possi
ble to develop simple but powerful predictive models. Perhaps more importan
tly, should an impact to be detected, strategies for remediation are more o
bvious as the causal processes are generally better known. The ultimate suc
cess of biomonitoring approaches depends on how well we understand the biop
hysical processes that influence the structure and dynamics of stream and r
iver systems, and the way they function.