A randomized trial comparing the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with solid tumors
Jt. Hartmann et al., A randomized trial comparing the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with solid tumors, INV NEW DR, 18(3), 2000, pp. 281-289
This study evaluates the degree of kidney damage during cisplatin/ifosfamid
e-based combination chemotherapy and its possible prevention by amifostine.
Thirty-one patients with solid tumors stratified according to pretreatment
were randomized to receive VIP- or TIP-chemotherapy with or without amifos
tine (910 mg/m(2)) given as a short infusion prior to cisplatin. Chemothera
py consisted of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (4 g/m(2)) and either et
oposide (500 mg/m(2)) (= VIP) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) (= TIP) repeated
at 3 weekly intervals. For all patients the glomerular filtration rate (GFR
) measured by creatinine-clearance, serum creatinine, electrolytes and diff
erential urinary protein/enzyme excretion were determined prior to, during
and after each cycle. A total of 62 cycles of chemotherapy were evaluable.
In the amifostine-group GFR was fully maintained after application of two c
ycles of chemotherapy, whereas in the control group a > 30%-reduction of me
dian GFR (108 to 80 ml/min) was observed (p < 0.001). Patients receiving am
ifostine had a lower degree of high molecular weight proteins excretion ind
icating less glomerular damage. In both groups significant increases of tub
ular marker profiles peaking at day 3 after chemotherapy were observed with
a nearly complete reversibility of these changes prior to the next chemoth
erapy cycle. The number of patients with low magnesium serum levels during
treatment was 17% after amifostine application versus 69% in control patien
ts. The results seem to indicate that treatment with amifostine can preserv
e GFR after application of two cisplatin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy cycl
es. This may be advantageous if repetitive cycles of chemotherapy or subseq
uent administration of high dose chemotherapy is planned.