The assessment of quality of life (QoL) and economic outcomes of psych
otropic medications are closely related. Both costs and QoL are import
ant in establishing the value of new and existing drugs in order to as
sist patients, physicians, payers of health care, and society to make
optimal decisions. These parameters may be combined, as in cost-utilit
y analyses, or analysed separately. Although not a true reflection of
normal practice, clinical trials are most often the setting for measur
ement of these parameters. The viability of such analyses, which often
necessitate the inclusion of active comparators and additional work m
easuring costs and QoL, within the context of controlled studies must
be established early on in the development process. If 'registration o
riented' trials are inappropriate, alternative strategies must be purs
ued.