Mt. Heikkinen et al., DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN DYSPEPSIA - THE USEFULNESS OF UPPER ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND AND GASTROSCOPY, Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 15(2), 1997, pp. 82-86
Objectives - To examine the diagnostic value of gastroscopy and upper
abdominal ultrasound, which are frequently used as primary tests in dy
speptic patients in general practice, To test the influence of age for
accuracy of both diagnostic methods, Design - Clinical study, Setting
- Four health centres in Kuopio Province, Finland, Subjects - Four hu
ndred unselected consecutive dyspeptic patients (91 less than 45 years
of age) who consulted their general practitioners. Main outcome measu
res - Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value
s (PV), efficiency and usefulness index (UI) were calculated for upper
abdominal ultrasound and for gastroscopy in detecting the causes of d
yspepsia in primary care. Final diagnosis was determined after one yea
r follow-up, Results - The sensitivity of upper abdominal ultrasound i
n detecting the cause of dyspepsia was 0.07, the specificity 0.91, PV 0.36, PV- 0.56, and UI -0.001, Ultrasound was not more efficient in o
lder patients, Gastroscopy was the most efficient method with a sensit
ivity of 0.75, specificity 1.00, PV+ 0.99, PV- 0.83 and UI 0.56, The u
sefulness of gastroscopy was even better among patients over 45 years
of age, Conclusions - The usefulness of upper abdominal ultrasound is
low regardless of patient's age. Gastroscopy is superior to upper abdo
minal ultrasound as a first line diagnostic method in diagnosing dyspe
psia, especially among patients over 45 years of age.