A comparison of the efficacy and safety of morphine and pethidine as analgesia for suspected renal colic in the emergency setting

Citation
A. O'Connor et al., A comparison of the efficacy and safety of morphine and pethidine as analgesia for suspected renal colic in the emergency setting, J AC EMER M, 17(4), 2000, pp. 261-264
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
13510622 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
261 - 264
Database
ISI
SICI code
1351-0622(200007)17:4<261:ACOTEA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Objectives-The aim of this study was to compare morphine and pethidine in p atients with clinically suspected renal colic with regard to analgesic effi cacy, patient satisfaction and side effects. Methods-Double blinded, randomised controlled trial. Results-There was no significant difference between morphine and pethidine with respect to any of the parameters measured. Conclusion-Because of the well known adverse effects that may be associated with pethidine use, the authors recommend that morphine should be the pref erred agent in suspected renal colic, when an opioid analgesic is to be use d.