COMPUTER-ANIMATED DISPLAYS AND THE JURY - FACILITATIVE AND PREJUDICIAL EFFECTS

Authors
Citation
Sm. Kassin et Ma. Dunn, COMPUTER-ANIMATED DISPLAYS AND THE JURY - FACILITATIVE AND PREJUDICIAL EFFECTS, Law and human behavior, 21(3), 1997, pp. 269-281
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Law,"Medicine, Legal",Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01477307
Volume
21
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
269 - 281
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-7307(1997)21:3<269:CDATJ->2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Two experiments assessed the effects of computer-animated displays on mock jurors. In both, participants watched a trial involving a dispute over whether a man who fell to his death had accidentally slipped or jumped in a suicide. They watched a proplaintiff or prodefendant versi on in which the body landed 5-10 feet or 20-25 feet from the building. Within each condition, the distance testimony was presented orally or with an animated display. When the tape depicted the event In a neutr al manner judgments were more consistent with the physical evidence. B ut when the plaintiff and defense used the tape to depict their own pa rtisan theories, participants increasingly made judgments that contrad icted the physical evidence. Results suggest that computer-animated di splays have greater impact than oral testimony. Whether that impact is to facilitate or mislead a jury, however depends on the nature of the display.