Utility assessment is required to estimate quality-adjusted life years, but
is often avoided due to the cumbersome nature of elicitation techniques. T
he Health Activities and Limitations Index (HALex) offers a method of utili
ty assessment using existing values from the National Health Interview Surv
ey (NHIS) and a utility algorithm to derive preferences. The authors assess
ed the construct validity of the HALex by comparing derived values with dir
ectly assessed HALex utilities in patients post acute myocardial infarction
(AMI). OLS regression was used to model the relationship between utilities
and patient demographics, comorbidities, and treatment. The mean and media
n utility for patients (n = 160) was .57 (SD = 22) and .55 respectively, an
d was not statistically different from the mean [.57 (SD = .30)] and median
(.58) for similar NHIS respondents (n = 46). Patients with a comorbidity i
ndex of three or less had mean utilities .13 higher than the mean utility f
or patients with an index of four or more. No relationship was found betwee
n patients' age, race, and income and their utilities. The HALex scoring al
gorithm is a promising means to obtain utilities, and provides a methodolog
y to easily estimate utilities for patients, but is not without limitations
. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.