Early virological failure in naive human immunodeficiency virus patients receiving saquinavir (soft gel capsule)-stavudine-zalcitabine (MIKADO trial)is not associated with mutations conferring viral resistance
M. Mouroux et al., Early virological failure in naive human immunodeficiency virus patients receiving saquinavir (soft gel capsule)-stavudine-zalcitabine (MIKADO trial)is not associated with mutations conferring viral resistance, J CLIN MICR, 38(7), 2000, pp. 2726-2730
The MIKADO trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of stavudine-zalcita
bine-saquinavir (soft gel capsule) [d4T-ddC-SQV(SGC)] in 36 naive patients
(-3.3 log(10) units at week 24 [W24]). Among the 29 patients remaining on d
4T-ddC-SQV(SGC) until W24, 10 harbored a virological failure (viral load of
>200 copies/ml at W24) (group I). To determine the reasons for therapeutic
failure, genotypic and phenotypic resistance test results and SQV concentr
ations in plasma were analyzed and compared to those in successfully treate
d patients (viral load of <200 copies/ml at W24) (group 2). Reverse transcr
iptase and protease genotypic analyses in group 1 revealed the acquisition
of only one SQV-associated mutation (L90M) in only two patients. There was
no significant increase in the 50 or 90% inhibitory concentration of SQV in
patients with or without the L90M mutation. However, the fact that two pat
ients developed an L90M mutation only 4 weeks after relapse points to the n
eed for genotypic resistance testing in the context of an initial failure o
f the antiretroviral regimen. At W24, the median SQV concentration in group
1 (71 ng/ml) was significantly lower than in group 2 (475 ng/ml), and the
plasma SQV concentration was correlated with the viral load at W24 (r = -0.
5; P < 0.05) and with the drop in viral load between day 0 and W24 (r = -0.
5; P < 0.01). These results and the fact that the plasma SQV concentrations
in the two groups prior to relapse (W12) were not significantly different
strongly suggest that the early failure of this combination is not due to v
iral resistance but to a lack of compliance, pharmacological variability, a
nd drug interactions or a combination of these factors.