Methods of measurement of the phase transition temperatures in physical mol
ecular gels are analyzed. The "falling ball" technique, NMR, and rheology a
re compared. Temperature versus concentration phase diagrams can be easily
obtained, and the reliability and workability of the methods are discussed.
It appears that rheology is the more accurate and convenient technique whi
le the falling ball method provides acceptable Delta H, Delta S values, but
the melting temperature values are significantly altered. With NMR, kineti
c information associated with the molecular aggregation process can also be
extracted. (C) 2000 Academic Press.