This paper combines the use of random coefficient discrete choice models th
at allow for correlated errors in the form of unobserved preference heterog
eneity with an investigation of the reliability and usefulness of rankings
data. For the data we examine, we find significant unobserved preference he
terogeneity in the rankings, which violates the underlying assumptions of t
he rank-ordered legit model. Further, directly modeling unobserved preferen
ce heterogeneity results in significant improvement in the precision of the
parameter estimates and in estimated Willingness to Pay (WTP). The reliabi
lity and usefulness of rankings data should he re-examined with econometric
models not subject to the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA). (
C) 2000 Academic Press.