Contrary to data showing sensitivity to nontemporal properties of timed sig
nals, current theories of interval timing assume that animals can use the p
resence or absence of a signal as equally valid cues as long as duration is
the most predictive feature. Consequently, the authors examined rats' beha
vior when timing the absence of a visual or auditory stimulus in trace cond
itioning and in a "reversed" gap procedure. Memory for timing was tested by
presenting the stimulus as a reversed gap into its timed absence. Results
suggest that in trace conditioning (Experiment 1), rats time for the absenc
e of a stimulus by using its offset as a time marker. As in the standard ga
p procedure, the insertion of a reversed gap was expected to "stop" rats' i
nternal clock. In contrast, a reversed gap of 1-, 5-, or 15-s duration "res
et" the timing process in both trace conditioning (Experiment 2) and the re
versed gap procedure (Experiment 3). A direct comparison of the standard an
d reversed gap procedures (Experiment 4) supported these findings. Results
suggest that attentional mechanisms involving the salience or content of th
e gap might contribute to the response rule adopted in a gap procedure.