Rj. Lewis et al., Formation of an interfering substance, 3,4-dimethyl-5-phenyl-1,3-oxazolidine, during a pseudoephedrine urinalysis, J FOREN SCI, 45(4), 2000, pp. 898-901
During fatal aviation accident investigations, biosamples from the victims
are submitted to the FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute (CAMI) for drug analys
is. In the process of one such analysis by CAMI, an unknown substance was f
ound ina urine sample. Simultaneous screening by thin layer chromatography
(TLC) and gas chromatography/FID (GC/FLD) suggested the presence of pseudoe
phedrine. A subsequent routine confirmation analysis of a separate urine al
iquot by GC Fourier transform infrared (GC/FTIR) and GC mass spectrometry (
GC/MS) indicated that the retention times of the unknown substance matched
with those of pseudoephedrine. However, its infrared and mass spectra were
different-the -OH and -NH groups were missing, a C-O-C group was present, a
nd the molar mass was 12 atomic mass units (amu) more than that of pseudoep
hedrine. A subsequent literature search suggested that ephedrine-like amine
s react with aldehydes to form oxazolidines. Therefore, the 12-amu increase
could be accounted for by condensation of pseudoephedrine with formaldehyd
e. Since this aldehyde is present in various grades of methanol and ethyl a
cetate, and these solvents were used during the solid-phase extraction, 3,4
-dimethyl-5-phenyl-1,3-oxazolidine was synthesized by using (+)-pseudoephed
rine . HCl and formaldehyde. The analytical findings of the synthesized com
pound were consistent with those of the unknown interfering substance, conf
irming that it was the oxazolidine. Aldehyde contaminants in solvents or sp
ecimens can transform drugs of interest and may result in misidentification
of a compound originally present in specimens. Therefore, chemicals used i
n analyses should be of the highest available purity, and a multi-analytica
l approach should be adopted to maintain a high degree of quality assurance
.