This article argues that by adopting a medical approach to the conceptualiz
ation, diagnosis, and treatment of emotional and psychological distress, co
ntemporary psychotherapy has robbed itself of the possibility of genuinely
understanding the radically ethical nature and significance of human suffer
ing. This article discusses both some of the original sources and assumptio
ns that provided the impetus for the adoption of the medical model in psych
otherapy and also some contemporary restatements of these original position
s. In opposition to both the dualism and reductionism inherent in medical a
pproaches to psychotherapy, this article aims at providing a more hermeneut
ic-phenomenological understanding of human suffering, particularly as detai
led in the work. of the French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. Such an altern
ative approach will seek to explicate the radically ethical nature of human
suffering by recognizing therapists' fundamental responsibility to "suffer
-with" and "suffer-for" their clients.