Pm. Marcus et Pc. Prorok, Reanalysis of the Mayo Lung Project data: the impact of confounding and effect modification, J MED SCREE, 6(1), 1999, pp. 47-49
Objectives-To examine whether age at entry, history of cigarette smoking, e
xposure to non-tobacco lung carcinogens, or previous pulmonary illnesses we
re confounders or effect modifiers of the relation between screening and lu
ng cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project.
Setting-The Mayo Lung Project was a randomised, controlled, clinical trial
conducted between 1971 and 1986 in 9211 male smokers over the age of 45 in
Minnesota (USA). The group screened received chest x ray examination and sp
utum cytology every four months for six years. The unscreened group were re
commended to obtain usual care (annual chest x ray examination and sputum c
ytology). After follow up, lung cancer mortality was similar in both groups
.
Methods-Proportional hazard models were used to analyse data. A variable wa
s considered a confounder if its inclusion in a model changed the rate rati
o for screening by more than 15%; a variable was considered an effect modif
ier if its stratum-specific rate ratio for screening differed by a factor o
f two.
Results-None of the four aforementioned variables changed the rate ratio as
sociated with screening (1.07) by more than 2%. The effect of screening may
have differed by years smoked (rate ratio for smoking fewer than 30 years
2.4; rate ratio for smoking 30 or more years 1.0), though we suspect that t
his result occurred by chance.
Conclusion-Adjustment for or stratification by four established lung cancer
risk factors did not alter the original findings of the Mayo Lung Project.