M. Feuerstein et al., Development of a screen for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with work-related upper extremity disorders, J OCCUP ENV, 42(7), 2000, pp. 749-761
Citations number
82
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
This study prospectively examined the extent to which a set of medical, phy
sical, ergonomic, occupational psychosocial, and individual psychosocial va
riables would predict clinical outcome associated with a diverse set of wor
k-related upper extremity disorders in recently diagnosed individuals. This
investigation was designed to develop a tool for use in a clinical setting
to assist in identifying patients at risk for poorer outcome. Outcome was
measured at 1, 3, and 12 months apm completely a baseline questionnaire. Ou
tcome status was based on a median split of a standardized composite index
(symptoms, function, workdays lost, and mental health). Logistic regression
indicated that predictors of poorer outcome at 1 month were: upper extremi
ty comorbidity (risk ratio [RR], 1.58), pain severity (RR, 1.45), ergonomic
risk exposure (RR, 1.07), four job support (RR 1.03), and pain coping styl
e (RR, 1.54). At 3 months, poorer outcome was predicted by: symptom severit
y (RR, 10.46), job stress (RR, 1.20), and pain coping style (RR, 1.98). The
number of prior treatments/providers (RR, 1.77), past recommendation for s
urgery (RR, 6.43), and pain coping style were found to predict poorer outco
me at 12 months. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively for the models w
ere 77.4% and 71.8% at 1 month, 80. 6% and 82.4 % at 3 months, and 80.6% an
d 83.3% at 12 months. indicate that baseline measures of ergonomic and psyc
hosocial stress, pain severity, and Pain coping style predict clinical outc
ome at shorter. intervals, whereas number of past treatments/providers reco
mmendation for surgery and pain coping style predict longer-term outcome. T
he resulting prognostic screen providers a simple tool that assesses the mu
ltidimensional nature of work-related upper extremity disorders and predict
s clinical outcome. Furthermore, the findings suggest the importance of ear
ly intervention that addresses both physical and psychosocial stressors at
work. Specific recommendations to reduce the impact of observed risk factor
s are discussed.